How does the author feel about direct democracy?

The author expresses a viewpoint that highlights the potential pitfalls of direct democracy, suggesting that it can result in chaos and hinder effective governance. This perspective likely stems from concerns that in a system where every individual has a direct say in decision-making, the process may become disorganized and lead to rapid, ill-considered decisions rather than thoughtful deliberations. The complexity and nature of governance require not only public input but also structure and expertise, which can sometimes be compromised in a purely direct democracy.

In this context, other options such as enhancing public participation or providing thorough debate could be seen as positive aspects of direct democracy, but the author prioritizes the risks over these potential benefits. Additionally, while direct democracy might be preferred by some for its inclusivity, the emphasis in the correct answer is on the chaos and challenges it can create rather than any advantages it may offer. Thus, this choice encapsulates the author's critical stance on the effectiveness of direct democracy in practical governance.